Iliad essay: Agamemnon the King

Title: Agamemnon, the selfish, arrogant and versatile King\n\n In kors classics Iliad, the son of Atreus and the brother of Menelaus, Agamemnon was the king of Mycenae and led Hellenic forces in the Trojan War.\n\nThe disputed issue raised by historians and critics is the extent of guilt ascribed to Agamemnons deeds and feature. As tumesce as this, it is kind of elicit to investigate whether bulls eye himself provided us with an accurate account of Agamemnons example in his mere work.\n\n home run presents as the character of Agamemnon a man authorise with virtually unlimited and extensive power as nearly as a rather powerful social persuasion in the then society. However, his in the flesh(predicate) features did not deserve such(prenominal) a high status. kors Agamemnon do most of his decisions while rule by over-wrought emotions.\n\nOverall, Homers Agamemnon represents a profoundly flawed character overwhelmed by inner desires and emotions. His authoritati ve location was always predetermined by personal whims as puff up as individual postulate which were put atop of the substantial community interests. Such was the main(prenominal) controversy masterly render by Homer.\n\n On the unity hand, Agamemnon appears ahead us as a highly urbane warrior, though as a king he ofttimes demonstrates the features incompatible with the ideals of true kingship. These be namely: cowardice, stubbornness, as hearty as childishness and immaturity. every last(predicate) these personal disadvantages mixed with selfishness, arrogance and versatility make the epical character of Agamemnon as person that is stainless to an extent though morally flawed.\n\nFurthermore, one of the main proscribe features spotted by Homer throughout The Iliad is that Agamemnon fails to make conclusions and nail from his enormous mistakes.\n\nThat is why Homers character enormously falls throughout the epic.\n\n skilful from the beginning, the chara cter of Agamemnon appears as a courageous and great warrior that heroically destroyed the powerful soldiery as well as Troy. However, initially we get to roll in the hay Agamemnon as a person who changed the winds to get to Troy at the cost of the have of his give girlfriend Iphigenia.\n\nHerewith, two opponent features evolve inside a single man - an pushful and virtuous, or guilty and fierce character. For the sake of his selfish ambitions and avenge for Paris execration, he decides to yield further horrible crime and sacrifice Iphigenia. Reasonably this was through for the sake of the state and advantage of the Greek army, and therefore deemed by many as a righteous act.\n\nHowever, from the point of moral assumptions Agamemnons justification was evidently erroneous, rather flawed and slander action. His personal ambitions overtopped the vital principles of humanity, revel and devotion. Entirely virtuous as he was, Agamemnon could make no other decision than sacrifi ce his own daughter and competitiveness the city of Troy.\n\nLater on, Homer illustrates the inner moral quandary experienced by Agamemnon and convey through his confessions: What do I become - a giant to me, to the whole world, and to all future time, a monster, wearing my daughters blood?\n\nanother(prenominal) flawed expression of Agamemnon is visualised through his arrogant and irreverent attitude towards his wife. Utter infidelity and ignorance is seen in Agamemnons taunting and rather condemned words to her. His opprobrious actions led to her embarrassment in front of the chorus as well as before his new mistress, Cassandra. Blunt language he used showed that Agamemnon acted in a rather over-masculine and self-cantered manner.If you fatality to get a full phase of the moon essay, order it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly hel p you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.