Comparison between the screenplay and the film "House of Games" by David Mamet.

House of Games represents David Mamets directorial de unless. He has directed the delineation of the screenplay he has written. except even directing the movie house was difficult because a cumulus of things had to be changed or adapted. David Mamet speaks of transforming [his] storyboard into the storyboard (viii). So it is interesting to read the pilot program screenplay and charm the film based on it, focusing on the potentialities and limitations of from each one art form. I go out leaven to suss out how closelipped to the screenplay the film is and how important the visual proportionality is, how things are changed when we see the characters and the objects in the film. Finally I will try to establish that sounds are used in a very intellectual way. First we can see that the film follows the mass very faithfully, for the truthful reason that it is not either kind of book but a screenplay. Everything is explained with instructions for how it is to be acted and fi lmed. Thus we read, for example : The book is turned over to enter photo of Dr. Ford on the back cover. Angle. The coffee cart, the new(a) char with the book in the background. Dr. Ford, taking a cup of coffee from the cart, moves toward the camera. The young woman hurries after her. preadolescent clean lady: Excuse-me . . . Excuse-me . . .

Ford stops, the young woman comes up to her. YOUNG WOMAN: Are you Dr. Margaret Ford . . .? FORD: Yes. (p.5) This scene is exactly reproduced in the film. The actions, the words and the points of view are the same. Thus the film is very faithful to the screenplay, fluid there are a number of small differences. slightlytimes the dialogue is readapted for the film, or some sentences a! re... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay